↓ Skip to main content

Carbon isotopes and water use efficiency: sense and sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
500 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
765 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Carbon isotopes and water use efficiency: sense and sensitivity
Published in
Oecologia, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0932-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulli Seibt, Abazar Rajabi, Howard Griffiths, Joseph A. Berry

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 765 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
China 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 720 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 190 25%
Researcher 154 20%
Student > Master 105 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 37 5%
Other 120 16%
Unknown 112 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 321 42%
Environmental Science 180 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 78 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 <1%
Chemistry 5 <1%
Other 24 3%
Unknown 150 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,960
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,118
of 175,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.