↓ Skip to main content

Why are non-photosynthetic tissues generally 13C enriched compared with leaves in C3 plants? Review and synthesis of current hypotheses

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Plant Biology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why are non-photosynthetic tissues generally 13C enriched compared with leaves in C3 plants? Review and synthesis of current hypotheses
Published in
Functional Plant Biology, March 2009
DOI 10.1071/fp08216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucas A. Cernusak, Guillaume Tcherkez, Claudia Keitel, William K. Cornwell, Louis S. Santiago, Alexander Knohl, Margaret M. Barbour, David G. Williams, Peter B. Reich, David S. Ellsworth, Todd E. Dawson, Howard G. Griffiths, Graham D. Farquhar, Ian J. Wright

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 358 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 28%
Researcher 80 21%
Student > Master 41 11%
Professor 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 55 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 146 39%
Environmental Science 85 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 50 13%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 74 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Functional Plant Biology
#176
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,800
of 112,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Plant Biology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them