↓ Skip to main content

Freshwater cyanophages

Overview of attention for article published in Virologica Sinica, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Freshwater cyanophages
Published in
Virologica Sinica, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12250-013-3370-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han Xia, Tianxian Li, Fei Deng, Zhihong Hu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 94 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Researcher 20 21%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Environmental Science 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 21 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,583,598
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Virologica Sinica
#154
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,330
of 205,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virologica Sinica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.