↓ Skip to main content

Hospital cleaning in the 21st century

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Hospital cleaning in the 21st century
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10096-011-1250-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. J. Dancer

Abstract

More evidence is emerging on the importance of the clinical environment in encouraging hospital infection. This review considers the role of cleaning as an effective means to control infection. It describes the location of pathogen reservoirs and methods for evaluating hospitals' cleanliness. Novel biocides, antimicrobial coatings and equipment are available, many of which have not been assessed against patient outcome. Cleaning practices should be tailored to clinical risk, given the wide-ranging surfaces, equipment and building design. There is confusion between nursing and domestic personnel over the allocation of cleaning responsibilities and neither may receive sufficient training and/or time to complete their duties. Since less labourious practices for dirt removal are always attractive, there is a danger that traditional cleaning methods are forgotten or ignored. Few studies have examined detergent-based regimens or modelled these against infection risk for different patient categories. Fear of infection encourages the use of powerful disinfectants for the elimination of real or imagined pathogens in hospitals. Not only do these agents offer false assurance against contamination, their disinfection potential cannot be achieved without the prior removal of organic soil. Detergent-based cleaning is cheaper than using disinfectants and much less toxic. Hospital cleaning in the 21st century deserves further investigation for routine and outbreak practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 209 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 51 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 6%
Engineering 10 5%
Other 51 24%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,262,106
of 23,592,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#255
of 2,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,138
of 111,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,592,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.