| Title |
The picture talk project: Aboriginal community input on consent for research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0349-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily FM Fitzpatrick, Gaynor Macdonald, Alexandra LC Martiniuk, June Oscar, Heather D’Antoine, Maureen Carter, Tom Lawford, Elizabeth J Elliott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,082,851
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#211
of 1,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,649
of 442,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.