↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 30,000 samples identifies seven novel loci for quantitative ECG traits

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 30,000 samples identifies seven novel loci for quantitative ECG traits
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41431-018-0295-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica van Setten, Niek Verweij, Hamdi Mbarek, Maartje N. Niemeijer, Stella Trompet, Dan E. Arking, Jennifer A. Brody, Ilaria Gandin, Niels Grarup, Leanne M. Hall, Daiane Hemerich, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Hao Mei, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Bram P. Prins, Antonietta Robino, Albert V. Smith, Helen R. Warren, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Dorret I. Boomsma, Mark J. Caulfield, Mark Eijgelsheim, Ian Ford, Torben Hansen, Tamara B. Harris, Susan R. Heckbert, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Annamaria Iorio, Jan A. Kors, Allan Linneberg, Peter W. MacFarlane, Thomas Meitinger, Christopher P. Nelson, Olli T. Raitakari, Claudia T. Silva Aldana, Gianfranco Sinagra, Moritz Sinner, Elsayed Z. Soliman, Monika Stoll, Andre Uitterlinden, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Melanie Waldenberger, Alvaro Alonso, Paolo Gasparini, Vilmundur Gudnason, Yalda Jamshidi, Stefan Kääb, Jørgen K. Kanters, Terho Lehtimäki, Patricia B. Munroe, Annette Peters, Nilesh J. Samani, Nona Sotoodehnia, Sheila Ulivi, James G. Wilson, Eco J. C. de Geus, J. Wouter Jukema, Bruno Stricker, Pim van der Harst, Paul I. W. de Bakker, Aaron Isaacs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 31 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 35 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,232,080
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#2,746
of 3,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,954
of 452,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#77
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.