↓ Skip to main content

Response to ‘using social media to support small group learning’

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Response to ‘using social media to support small group learning’
Published in
BMC Medical Education, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1458-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omkar Rajesh Deodhar, Jai Mathur

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 19%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,665,776
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,799
of 3,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,831
of 438,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#76
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.