Title |
Delayed Colo‐anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: Pelvic Morbidity, Functional Results and Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-019-04918-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giuseppe Portale, George Octavian Popesc, Matteo Parotto, Francesco Cavallin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 21% |
Mexico | 2 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Yemen | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 47% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,963,049
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#634
of 4,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,652
of 435,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#16
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.