↓ Skip to main content

Population-based geographic variations in dxa bone density in Europe: The evos study

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Population-based geographic variations in dxa bone density in Europe: The evos study
Published in
Osteoporosis International, May 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf01622286
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Lunt, D. Felsenberg, J. Adams, L. Benevolenskaya, J. Cannata, J. Dequeker, C. Dodenhof, J. A. Falch, O. Johnell, K. T. Khaw, P. Masaryk, H. Pols, G. Poor, D. Reid, C. Scheidt-Nave, K. Weber, A. J. Silman, J. Reeve

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Engineering 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 12 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,343
of 3,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,500
of 30,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.