You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plasma phospholipid fatty acid profiles and their association with food intakes: results from a cross-sectional study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26834 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mitra Saadatian-Elahi, Nadia Slimani, Véronique Chajès, Mazda Jenab, Joëlle Goudable, Carine Biessy, Pietro Ferrari, Graham Byrnes, Philippe Autier, Petra HM Peeters, Marga Ocké, Bas Bueno de Mesquita, Ingegerd Johansson, Göran Hallmans, Jonas Manjer, Elisabet Wirfält, Carlos A González, Carmen Navarro, Carmen Martinez, Pilar Amiano, Laudina Rodriguez Suárez, Eva Ardanaz, Anne Tjønneland, Jytte Halkjaer, Kim Overvad, Marianne Uhre Jakobsen, Franco Berrino, Valeria Pala, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Paolo Vineis, Maria Santucci de Magistris, Elisabeth A Spencer, Francesca L Crowe, Sheila Bingham, Kay-Tee Khaw, Jakob Linseisen, Sabine Rohrmann, Heiner Boeing, Ute Noethlings, Karina Standahl Olsen, Guri Skeie, Eiliv Lund, Antonia Trichopoulou, Erifili Oustoglou, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Elio Riboli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Norway | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#10,892
of 12,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,002
of 182,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#118
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.