↓ Skip to main content

Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Men and Women, the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Men and Women, the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, November 2008
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabina Rinaldi, Sabine Rohrmann, Mazda Jenab, Carine Biessy, Sabina Sieri, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Amalla Mattiello, Paolo Vineis, Alexandra Nieters, Jakob Linseisen, Tobias Pischon, Heiner Boeing, Göran Hallmans, Richard Palmqvist, Jonas Manjer, Elisabet Wirfält, Francesca L. Crowe, Kay-Tee T. Khaw, Sheila Bingham, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Kim Overvad, Eiliv Lund, Guri Skeie, Francoise Clavel-Chapelon, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain, Eva Ardanaz, Paula Jakszyn, Jose Ramon Quiros, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Maria-Jose Sanchez, Miren Dorronsoro, Antonia Trichopoulou, Pagona Lagiou, Dimitrious Trichopoulos, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Fränzel J.B. van Duijnhoven, Petra H.M. Peeters, Nadia Slimani, Pietro Ferrari, Graham B. Byrnes, Elio Riboli, Rudolf Kaaks

Abstract

Although large-scale prospective cohort studies have related hyperglycemia to increased risk of cancer overall, studies specifically on colorectal cancer have been generally small. We investigated the association between prediagnostic levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), a marker for average glucose level in blood, and colorectal cancer risk in a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. One thousand and twenty-six incident colorectal cancer cases (561 men and 465 women) and 1,026 matched controls were eligible for the study. Multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORS) adjusted for possible confounders. Increasing HbA1c percentages were statistically significantly associated with a mild increase in colorectal cancer risk in the whole population [OR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01,1.19 for a 10% increase in HbA1c]. In women, increasing HbA1c percentages were associated with a statistically significant increase in colorectal cancer risk (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01, 1.32 for a 10% increase in HbA1c) and with a borderline statistically significant increase in rectum cancer (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.99,1.50 for a 10% increase in HbA1c). No significant association with cancer risk was observed in men. The results of the current study suggest a mild implication of hyperglycemia in colorectal cancer, which seems more important in women than in men, and more for cancer of the rectum than of the colon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 29%
Other 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2016.
All research outputs
#16,279,421
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#3,179
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,487
of 105,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#63
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.