You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Weak magnetic fields alter stem cell–mediated growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aau7201 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alanna V. Van Huizen, Jacob M. Morton, Luke J. Kinsey, Donald G. Von Kannon, Marwa A. Saad, Taylor R. Birkholz, Jordan M. Czajka, Julian Cyrus, Frank S. Barnes, Wendy S. Beane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 25% |
| Germany | 4 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Réunion | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 67% |
| Scientists | 15 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#144,045
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#1,288
of 12,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,014
of 446,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#27
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.