You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intake estimation of total and individual flavan-3-ols, proanthocyanidins and theaflavins, their food sources and determinants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Nutrition, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007114511006386 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Viktoria Knaze, Raul Zamora-Ros, Leila Luján-Barroso, Isabelle Romieu, Augustin Scalbert, Nadia Slimani, Elio Riboli, Caroline T. M. van Rossum, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Antonia Trichopoulou, Vardis Dilis, Konstantinos Tsiotas, Guri Skeie, Dagrun Engeset, J. Ramón Quirós, Esther Molina, José María Huerta, Francesca Crowe, Elisabet Wirfäl, Ulrika Ericson, Petra H. M. Peeters, Rudolf Kaaks, Birgit Teucher, Gerd Johansson, Ingegerd Johansson, Rosario Tumino, Heiner Boeing, Dagmar Drogan, Pilar Amiano, Amalia Mattiello, Kay-Tee Khaw, Robert Luben, Vittorio Krogh, Eva Ardanáz, Carlotta Sacerdote, Simonetta Salvini, Kim Overvad, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Guy Fagherazzi, Florence Perquier, Carlos A. González |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,320,735
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nutrition
#1,958
of 6,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,576
of 248,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nutrition
#33
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.