↓ Skip to main content

Lifelong socioeconomic position and physical performance in midlife: results from the British 1946 birth cohort

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Lifelong socioeconomic position and physical performance in midlife: results from the British 1946 birth cohort
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10654-011-9562-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bjørn Heine Strand, Rachel Cooper, Rebecca Hardy, Diana Kuh, Jack Guralnik

Abstract

Socioeconomic position (SEP) across life is found to be related to adult physical performance, but the underlying pathways are not well characterized. Using a British birth cohort (N = 2956), the associations of SEP from childhood into midlife with objective physical performance measures in midlife were examined, adjusting for possible confounders or mediators, including indicators of muscle development and central nervous system function. Childhood and adulthood SEP were positively related to standing balance and chair rise performance, but not to grip strength after basic adjustments. When both father's occupation and mother's education were included in the same model, having a mother with low education was associated with 0.6 standard deviations (SD) (95% confidence interval (CI: 0.3, 0.8)) poorer standing balance time compared with having a mother with the highest educational level, and having a father in the lowest occupational group was associated with a 0.3 SD (95% CI: 0.1, 0.6) lower chair rise score compared with having a father in the highest occupational group. These associations were maintained, albeit attenuated, after adjustment. In contrast, the associations of own education and adult occupation with physical performance were generally not maintained after adjustment. SEP across life impacts on midlife physical performance, and thereby the ageing process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 24%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Social Sciences 10 15%
Sports and Recreations 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2012.
All research outputs
#17,654,408
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1,405
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,257
of 120,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.