You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pay for Performance in Primary Care in England and California: Comparison of Unintended Consequences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Family Medicine, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1370/afm.946 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth McDonald, Martin Roland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Researcher | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 40% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 16 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#922,917
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#399
of 1,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,209
of 108,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.