| Title |
Experimental observation on the flow-induced assembly of Carbon nanotube suspensions to form helical bands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rheologica Acta, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00397-007-0183-x |
| Authors |
Anson W. K. Ma, Malcolm R. Mackley, Sameer S. Rahatekar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 41% |
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 18 | 49% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,709,809
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Rheologica Acta
#24
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,521
of 75,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheologica Acta
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.