↓ Skip to main content

Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled parallel-group trial to compare the effectiveness of remotely delivered cognitive-behavioural and graded exercise interventions with usual care alone…

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled parallel-group trial to compare the effectiveness of remotely delivered cognitive-behavioural and graded exercise interventions with usual care alone to lessen the impact of fatigue in inflammatory rheumatic diseases (LIFT)
Published in
BMJ Open, January 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn R Martin, Eva-Maria Bachmair, Lorna Aucott, Emma Dures, Richard Emsley, Stuart R Gray, Sarah Hewlett, Vinod Kumar, Karina Lovell, Gary J Macfarlane, Graeme MacLennan, Paul McNamee, John Norrie, Lorna Paul, Stuart Ralston, Stefan Siebert, Alison Wearden, Peter D White, Neil Basu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 7 6%
Student > Master 7 6%
Professor 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 50 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Psychology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 57 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,608,799
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#15,095
of 25,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,802
of 446,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#454
of 697 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 697 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.