| Title |
The Accuracy of Acquiring Heart Rate Variability from Portable Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-019-01061-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ward C. Dobbs, Michael V. Fedewa, Hayley V. MacDonald, Clifton J. Holmes, Zackary S. Cicone, Daniel J. Plews, Michael R. Esco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 49% |
| Scientists | 17 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 309 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 15% |
| Researcher | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 19% |
| Unknown | 88 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 67 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 8% |
| Psychology | 21 | 7% |
| Engineering | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 16% |
| Unknown | 97 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,929,395
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,367
of 2,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,767
of 451,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#29
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.