Title |
Attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women among Chinese health care providers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reproductive Health, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12978-019-0678-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ziliang Wang, Chaohua Lou, Longmei Jin, Maohua Miao, Xiaowen Tu, Hong Liang, Yan Cheng, Wei Yuan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 38 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 39 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,838,604
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#579
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,725
of 437,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#21
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.