↓ Skip to main content

Facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection: double balloon endolumenal platform significantly improves dissection time compared with conventional technique (with video)

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Facilitating endoscopic submucosal dissection: double balloon endolumenal platform significantly improves dissection time compared with conventional technique (with video)
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00464-018-6336-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Sharma, Kota Momose, Hisashi Hara, James East, Kazuki Sumiyama, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Gerd Silbehumer, Jeffrey Milsom

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Design 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,603,577
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,688
of 6,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,402
of 327,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#40
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.