↓ Skip to main content

Back to the future: conserving functional and phylogenetic diversity in amphibian-climate refuges

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Back to the future: conserving functional and phylogenetic diversity in amphibian-climate refuges
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10531-019-01706-x
Authors

Ricardo Lourenço-de-Moraes, Felipe S. Campos, Rodrigo B. Ferreira, Mirco Solé, Karen H. Beard, Rogério P. Bastos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 31 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 42%
Environmental Science 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 32 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,961,759
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#859
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,822
of 443,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.