| Title |
A recipe for weed disaster in islands: a super-generalist native pollinator aided by a ‘Parlourmaid’ plant welcome new arrivals in Fiji
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-019-01923-z |
| Authors |
Sarah E. Hayes, Marika Tuiwawa, Mark I. Stevens, Michael P. Schwarz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,575,461
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#2,267
of 2,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,381
of 438,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#39
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.