↓ Skip to main content

Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-010: a Phase II/III Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced, Programmed Death Ligand 1–Expressing NSCLC

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic Oncology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-010: a Phase II/III Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Docetaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced, Programmed Death Ligand 1–Expressing NSCLC
Published in
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, January 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrice Barlesi, Edward B Garon, Dong-Wan Kim, Enriqueta Felip, Ji-Youn Han, Joo-Hang Kim, Myung-Ju Ahn, Mary Jo Fidler, Matthew A Gubens, Gilberto de Castro, Veerle Surmont, Qiao Li, Anne C Deitz, Gregory M Lubiniecki, Roy S Herbst

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 37 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Unspecified 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 45 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,672,981
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#694
of 3,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,040
of 446,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic Oncology
#6
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.