| Title |
A multicentre controlled pre–post trial of an implementation science intervention to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05532-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henry T. Stelfox, Rebecca Brundin-Mather, Andrea Soo, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Daniel J. Niven, Kirsten M. Fiest, Christopher James Doig, Danny J. Zuege, Barry Kushner, Fiona Clement, Sharon E. Straus, Deborah J. Cook, Sean M. Bagshaw, Khara M. Sauro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 19% |
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 64% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,351,856
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,206
of 5,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,210
of 447,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#28
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.