| Title |
(How) does RBF strengthen strategic purchasing of health care? Comparing the experience of Uganda, Zimbabwe and the Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Health Research and Policy, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41256-019-0094-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophie Witter, Maria Paola Bertone, Justine Namakula, Pamela Chandiwana, Yotamu Chirwa, Aloysius Ssennyonjo, Freddie Ssengooba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 22% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 15% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 4% |
| Egypt | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,743,532
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Global Health Research and Policy
#37
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,897
of 448,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health Research and Policy
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.