| Title |
Clinical determination of folates: recent analytical strategies and challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-019-01574-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jana Verstraete, Filip Kiekens, Simon Strobbe, Hans De Steur, Xavier Gellynck, Dominique Van Der Straeten, Christophe P. Stove |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,677
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,712
of 447,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#72
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.