↓ Skip to main content

Biexponential diffusion decay in formalin‐fixed prostate tissue: Preliminary findings

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biexponential diffusion decay in formalin‐fixed prostate tissue: Preliminary findings
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/mrm.23291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger M. Bourne, Nyoman Kurniawan, Gary Cowin, Timothy Stait‐Gardner, Paul Sved, Geoffrey Watson, Supriya Chowdhury, William S. Price

Abstract

Magnetic resonance microimaging was used to measure diffusion decay over an extended b-factor range in a formalin-fixed normal prostate sample and a Gleason pattern 3+4 cancer tissue sample. The coefficients of biexponential fits to diffusion decay data from 1600 voxels of dimension 160 × 160 × 160 μm(3) in each sample were correlated with underlying epithelial and stromal compartment partial volumes estimated from high-resolution apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) data (40 × 40 × 40 μm(3) voxels) from the same tissue. In the normal tissue sample, the signal fractions of the low and high ADC components of the biexponential fits correlated linearly with partial volumes of epithelial tissue (R(2) = 0.6) and stromal tissue (R(2) = 0.5), respectively. Similar but weaker correlations were observed in the cancer sample. Epithelium-containing high spatial resolution voxels appeared to be composed of ∼60% low ADC and ∼40% high ADC component. Stromal voxels appeared to be composed of ∼20% low ADC and ∼80% high ADC component. This preliminary report suggests that distinctly different diffusion properties in microscopically adjacent cell types contribute to the multiexponential diffusion decay phenomenon in prostate tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Master 8 12%
Other 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Physics and Astronomy 7 10%
Computer Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2012.
All research outputs
#16,744,582
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#5,640
of 7,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,650
of 250,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#86
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.