↓ Skip to main content

Current management strategies for the pain of elderly patients with burning mouth syndrome: a critical review

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Current management strategies for the pain of elderly patients with burning mouth syndrome: a critical review
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13030-019-0142-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trang T. H. Tu, Miho Takenoshita, Hirofumi Matsuoka, Takeshi Watanabe, Takayuki Suga, Yuma Aota, Yoshihiro Abiko, Akira Toyofuku

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 38 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 39%
Psychology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 38 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,241,519
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#62
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,633
of 437,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.