↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of frailty at population level in European ADVANTAGE Joint Action Member States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of frailty at population level in European ADVANTAGE Joint Action Member States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Published in
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2018
DOI 10.4415/ann_18_03_10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rónán O'Caoimh, Lucia Galluzzo, Ángel Rodríguez-Laso, Johan Van der Heyden, Anette Hylen Ranhoff, Maria Lamprini-Koula, Marius Ciutan, Luz López-Samaniego, Laure Carcaillon-Bentata, Siobhán Kennelly, Aaron Liew

Abstract

Although frailty is common among community-dwelling older adults, its prevalence in Europe and how this varies between countries is unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature on frailty prevalence in 22 European countries involved in the Joint Action ADVANTAGE was conducted. Sixty-two papers, representing 68 unique datasets were included. Meta-analysis showed an overall estimated frailty prevalence of 18% (95% confidence interval, CI, 15-21%). The prevalence in community (n = 53) vs non-community based studies (n = 15) was 12% (95% CI 10-15%) and 45% (95% CI 27-63%), respectively. Pooled prevalence in community studies adopting a physical phenotype was 12% (95% CI 10-14%, n = 45) vs 16% (95% CI 7-29%, n = 8) for all other definitions. Sub-analysis of a subgroup of studies assessed as high-quality (n = 47) gave a pooled estimate of 17% (95% CI 13-21%). The considerable and significant heterogeneity found warrants the development of common methodological approaches to provide accurate and comparable frailty prevalence estimates at population-level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 57 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Unspecified 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 65 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#58
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,402
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.