↓ Skip to main content

Population screening, monitoring and surveillance for frailty: three systematic reviews and a grey literature review.

Overview of attention for article published in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population screening, monitoring and surveillance for frailty: three systematic reviews and a grey literature review.
Published in
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2018
DOI 10.4415/ann_18_03_13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ángel Rodríguez-Laso, Rónán O'Caoimh, Lucia Galluzzo, Laure Carcaillon-Bentata, Nathalie Beltzer, Jurate Macijauskiene, Olatz Albaina Bacaicoa, Marius Ciutan, Anne Hendry, Luz López-Samaniego, Aaron Liew

Abstract

Little is known about programmes or interventions for the screening, monitoring and surveillance of frailty at population level. Three systematic searches and an opportunistic grey literature review from the countries participating in the ADVANTAGE Joint Action were performed. Three studies reported local interventions to screen for frailty, two of them using a two-step screening and assessment method and one including monitoring activities. Another paper reviewed both providers' and participants' experiences of screening activities. Three on-going European projects and population-screening programmes in primary care await evaluation. An electronic Frailty Index for use with patients' primary care records has been recently validated. No study described systematic processes for the surveillance of frailty. There is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of population-level screening, monitoring and surveillance of frailty. Development and evaluation of community-based two-step programmes including those that incorporate electronic health records, particularly in primary care, are now needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 160%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 100%
Student > Master 4 80%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 60%
Librarian 1 20%
Other 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 180%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 120%
Design 2 40%
Computer Science 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Other 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#231
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#389,382
of 449,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.