| Title |
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-019-06666-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanna Koppatz, Jukka Harju, Jukka Sirén, Panu Mentula, Tom Scheinin, Ville Sallinen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Yemen | 1 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,127,946
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#186
of 7,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,073
of 452,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#5
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.