You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Elevated platelet count appears to be causally associated with increased risk of lung cancer: A Mendelian randomization analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-0356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying Zhu, Yongyue Wei, Ruyang Zhang, Xuesi Dong, Sipeng Shen, Yang Zhao, Jianling Bai, Demetrius Albanes, Neil E Caporaso, Maria Teresa Landi, Bin Zhu, Stephen J Chanock, Fangyi Gu, Stephen Lam, Ming-Sound Tsao, Frances A Shepherd, Adonina Tardon, Ana Fernández-Somoano, Guillermo Fernandez-Tardon, Chu Chen, Matthew J Barnett, Jennifer Doherty, Stig E Bojesen, Mattias Johansson, Paul Brennan, James D McKay, Robert Carreras-Torres, Thomas Muley, Angela Risch, Heunz-Erich Wichmann, Heike Bickeboeller, Albert Rosenberger, Gad Rennert, Walid Saliba, Susanne M Arnold, John K Field, Michael P A Davies, Michael W Marcus, Xifeng Wu, Yuanqing Ye, Loic Le Marchand, Lynne R Wilkens, Olle Melander, Jonas Manjer, Hans Brunnström, Rayjean J Hung, Geoffrey Liu, Yonathan Brhane, Linda Kachuri, Angeline S Andrew, Eric J Duell, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Erik Hfm van der Heijden, Aage Haugen, Shanbeh Zienolddiny, Vidar Skaug, Kjell Grankvist, Mikael Johansson, Penella J Woll, Angela Cox, Fiona Taylor, Dawn M Teare, Philip Lazarus, Matthew B Schabath, Melinda C Aldrich, Richard S Houlston, John McLaughlin, Victoria L Stevens, Hongbing Shen, Zhibin Hu, Juncheng Dai, Christopher I Amos, Younghun Han, Dakai Zhu, Gary E Goodman, Feng Chen, David C Christiani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 27% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,996,865
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#865
of 4,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,722
of 363,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#14
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.