| Title |
Investigation on Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction and Separation of Enduracidin from Streptomyces sp. NJWGY3665
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12010-011-9473-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yonghong Hu, Wenge Yang, Wenqian Wan, Fei Shen, Ziyu Lei, Dandan Wang |
| Abstract |
Ultrasound-assisted extraction of enduracidin from Streptomyces sp. NJWGY3665 was studied. The effects of various factors on the yield of target components were investigated. The results showed that the extraction by ultrasound-assisted extraction is four times faster than those by conventional solvent extraction. The results also indicated that fast extraction rate was obtained in the first 30 min, and the maximum yield was obtained at the power of 150 W. The effects of other factors such as different solvents, solvent concentration, solvent to solid ratio, and extraction batches on the field were also discussed. The optimum conditions were found at solvent of methanol, time of 30 min, power of 150 W, pH of 7.0, solvent to solid ratio of 50 ml/g, solvent concentration of 70% and extraction batches of four times. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2012.
All research outputs
#18,303,566
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1,764
of 2,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,679
of 243,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#28
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,494 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.