↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being

Overview of attention for article published in American Sociological Review, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 1,930)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
310 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consequences of Routine Work-Schedule Instability for Worker Health and Well-Being
Published in
American Sociological Review, February 2019
DOI 10.1177/0003122418823184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Schneider, Kristen Harknett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 310 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 350 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 20%
Student > Master 30 9%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Student > Bachelor 21 6%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 130 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 93 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 33 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 5%
Psychology 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 147 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 574. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#41,420
of 25,591,967 outputs
Outputs from American Sociological Review
#15
of 1,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#826
of 448,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Sociological Review
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,591,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.