↓ Skip to main content

Resident Self-Portraiture: A Reflective Tool to Explore the Journey of Becoming a Doctor

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Humanities, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Resident Self-Portraiture: A Reflective Tool to Explore the Journey of Becoming a Doctor
Published in
Journal of Medical Humanities, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10912-018-9545-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christy L. Tharenos, Amber M. Hayden, Emily Cook

Abstract

This arts- based project creatively introduces residents to photography, self-portraiture and narratives to document the longitudinal journey of becoming a family physician. Visual arts and writing can foster reflection: an important skill to cultivate in developing physicians. Unfortunately, arts based programs are lacking in many residency programs. Tools and venues that nourish physician well being and resilience may be important in today's changing healthcare environment and epidemic of physician burnout. Residents created self-portraits with accompanying narratives throughout their three-year training. Analysis of the portraits and accompanying narratives completed the assessment. Residents created a body of work that includes 182 creative and deeply personal portraits and narratives. The five most frequent themes of portraits included "Residency is Difficult," "Hobbies," "Family," "Growing as a Doctor," and "Coping Mechanisms." Self-portrait photography and reflection gives insight into the journey of becoming a family medicine physician at a deeply personal and professional level. Further partnerships between residency programs and the arts should be explored to promote reflection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Psychology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 20 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,518,167
of 25,216,325 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Humanities
#388
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,412
of 449,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Humanities
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,216,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.