↓ Skip to main content

Untreated prenatal maternal depression and the potential risks to offspring: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
Title
Untreated prenatal maternal depression and the potential risks to offspring: a review
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00737-011-0251-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deana B. Davalos, Carly A. Yadon, Hope C. Tregellas

Abstract

Research exploring the effects of prenatal maternal depression on a developing fetus and child is underrepresented in the literature. Empirical papers have typically focused on the effects of postpartum depression (after birth) instead of prepartum depression (before birth). Disparate empirical findings have produced ongoing debate regarding the effects of prenatal depression on a developing fetus and later in infancy and early childhood. Even more controversial is determining the role of antidepressant medication on offspring outcomes and whether research that does not include the proper control population (e.g., unmedicated depressed participants) can adequately address questions about risks and benefits of treatment during pregnancy. The current review systematically summarizes the literature focusing on unmedicated prenatal depression and offspring outcome and concludes that prepartum depression is highly prevalent, is associated with negative outcomes in offspring, and remains understudied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 279 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 16%
Student > Master 47 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 68 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 25%
Psychology 59 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 76 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,227,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#152
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,722
of 256,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them