↓ Skip to main content

仮説設定における思考過程とその合理性に関する基礎的研究

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Research in Science Education, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
仮説設定における思考過程とその合理性に関する基礎的研究
Published in
Journal of Research in Science Education, January 2018
DOI 10.11639/sjst.17005
Authors

中村 大輝, 松浦 拓也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,699,113
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Research in Science Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,495
of 451,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Research in Science Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them