You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calcium-Activated Calpain Specifically Cleaves Glutamate Receptor IIA But Not IIB at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroscience, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1523/jneurosci.2213-17.2019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elsayed Metwally, Guoli Zhao, Wenhua Li, Qifu Wang, Yong Q. Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Egypt | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 8 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,645,076
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#7,336
of 23,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,017
of 440,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#132
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.