↓ Skip to main content

Decision-making algorithm for ascending aortic aneurysm: Effectiveness in clinical application?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision-making algorithm for ascending aortic aneurysm: Effectiveness in clinical application?
Published in
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayman Saeyeldin, Mohammad A Zafar, Yupeng Li, Maryam Tanweer, Mohamed Abdelbaky, Anton Gryaznov, Adam J Brownstein, Camilo A Velasquez, Joelle Buntin, Kabir Thombre, Wei-Guo Ma, Young Erben, John A Rizzo, Bulat A Ziganshin, John A Elefteriades

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 22 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 34%
Engineering 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,502,382
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#359
of 7,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,815
of 355,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#7
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.