↓ Skip to main content

3D-MRI versus 3D-CT in the evaluation of osseous anatomy in femoroacetabular impingement using Dixon 3D FLASH sequence

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Radiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
3D-MRI versus 3D-CT in the evaluation of osseous anatomy in femoroacetabular impingement using Dixon 3D FLASH sequence
Published in
Skeletal Radiology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00256-018-3049-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Samim, Nima Eftekhary, Jonathan M. Vigdorchik, Ameer Elbuluk, Roy Davidovitch, Thomas Youm, Soterios Gyftopoulos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 18 28%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Engineering 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,796,460
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Radiology
#271
of 1,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,810
of 336,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Radiology
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.