| Title |
Medical Students’ Attention to Multiple Risk Behaviors: A Standardized Patient Examination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-011-1953-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith J. Prochaska, Kathleen Gali, Bernie Miller, Karen E. Hauer |
| Abstract |
Risk behaviors tend to cluster, particularly among smokers, with negative health effects. To optimize patients' health and wellbeing, health care providers ideally would assess and intervene upon the multiple risks with which patients may present. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Librarian | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 43% |
| Psychology | 15 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,057,216
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,588
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,923
of 250,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#36
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.