↓ Skip to main content

Does China’s Belt and Road Initiative Challenge the Liberal, Rules-Based Order?

Overview of attention for article published in Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Does China’s Belt and Road Initiative Challenge the Liberal, Rules-Based Order?
Published in
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40647-019-00252-8
Authors

Lee Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Lecturer 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 44 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 28 32%
Arts and Humanities 6 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 46 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,642,845
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
#16
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,166
of 439,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.