↓ Skip to main content

Improved Separation of Intact Glucosinolates in Bee Pollen by Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Food Analytical Methods, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Improved Separation of Intact Glucosinolates in Bee Pollen by Using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Published in
Food Analytical Methods, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12161-019-01446-2
Authors

José Bernal, David González, Silvia Valverde, Laura Toribio, Ana M. Ares

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 43%
Unspecified 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,552,296
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Food Analytical Methods
#304
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,978
of 438,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Analytical Methods
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.