You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
凍結によるインスリン製剤の性状変化観察と凍結後解凍したインスリン製剤の使用防止のための患者説明のありかた
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.11213/tonyobyo1958.46.767 |
| Authors |
朝倉 俊成, 清野 弘明 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#14,434,144
of 25,623,883 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society
#72
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,627
of 54,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,623,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them