↓ Skip to main content

The culture-dependent and culture-independent analysis for determination of bacterial diversity within Limnatis nilotica (Clitellata: Hirudinea)

Overview of attention for article published in Biologia, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
The culture-dependent and culture-independent analysis for determination of bacterial diversity within Limnatis nilotica (Clitellata: Hirudinea)
Published in
Biologia, January 2019
DOI 10.2478/s11756-019-00194-2
Authors

Ali Sevim, Elif Sevim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,559,348
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Biologia
#255
of 385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,543
of 437,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.