| Title |
Perceived helpfulness of treatments for myofascial TMD as a function of comorbid widespread pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00784-018-02797-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivian Santiago, Karen G. Raphael |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 22% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#734,798
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#16
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,784
of 438,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.