| Title |
Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lars Søndergaard, Nikolaj Ihlemann, Davide Capodanno, Troels H. Jørgensen, Henrik Nissen, Bo Juel Kjeldsen, Yanping Chang, Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel, Peter Skov Olsen, Anna Sonia Petronio, Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 187 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 22% |
| Spain | 18 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 7% |
| Argentina | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 124 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 15% |
| Scientists | 28 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 269 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 14% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 90 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 145 | 54% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | <1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 99 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#326,712
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#752
of 16,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,333
of 450,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#16
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.