Title |
Associations Between Polypharmacy, Symptom Burden, and Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced, Life-Limiting Illness
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-04837-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yael Schenker, Seo Young Park, Kwonho Jeong, Jennifer Pruskowski, Dio Kavalieratos, Judith Resick, Amy Abernethy, Jean S. Kutner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 44% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 69% |
Scientists | 7 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 191 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 15% |
Researcher | 15 | 8% |
Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Other | 32 | 17% |
Unknown | 75 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Unknown | 82 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,161,897
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#936
of 8,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,702
of 448,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#16
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.