| Title |
Imaging and Impact of Myocardial Fibrosis in Aortic Stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rong Bing, João L. Cavalcante, Russell J. Everett, Marie-Annick Clavel, David E. Newby, Marc R. Dweck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 55% |
| Scientists | 14 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 46% |
| Engineering | 11 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,017,805
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#295
of 2,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,246
of 447,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#21
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.