↓ Skip to main content

Active living neighborhoods: is neighborhood walkability a key element for Belgian adolescents?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Active living neighborhoods: is neighborhood walkability a key element for Belgian adolescents?
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Femke De Meester, Delfien Van Dyck, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Benedicte Deforche, James F Sallis, Greet Cardon

Abstract

In adult research, neighborhood walkability has been acknowledged as an important construct among the built environmental correlates of physical activity. Research into this association has only recently been extended to adolescents and the current empirical evidence is not consistent. This study investigated whether neighborhood walkability and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with physical activity among Belgian adolescents and whether the association between neighborhood walkability and physical activity is moderated by neighborhood SES and gender.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 182 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 18%
Student > Master 31 16%
Researcher 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 43 22%
Unknown 37 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 32 17%
Sports and Recreations 26 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Unspecified 10 5%
Other 46 24%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,682,944
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,635
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,926
of 244,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#54
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.